Beard thesis of the constitution ap us history
No debates from the other four state ratifying conventions are included. It is somewhat dated though, as there has been new scholarship on the early American economy in the last twenty years. The New Quantitative Approach Recently economic historians have begun to reexamine the behavior of our Founding Fathers concerning the Constitution.
Robert E. In doing so, they rationally weighed the expected costs and benefits of their decision to ratify. Concludes that issues of basic constitutional design were decided on the basis of principle, whereas specific economic and political interests decided votes involving more specific issues.
They would have had greater ability at the state level with decentralized government to avoid heavy land taxation — levied to pay off the public debt — and to promote paper money and debt moratorium issues that advanced their interests. They also suggest that economic and other interests played important roles at the ratifying conventions. Findings of the Quantitative Approach: A New Economic Interpretation of the Constitution One unambiguous conclusion can be drawn from the recent quantitative studies: There is a valid economic interpretation of the Constitution. While this may be correct as far as it goes, the issue of the influence of slaveholdings on the behavior of the Founding Fathers, as is the influence of any factor, is actually more complex. Many studies in the traditional literature question an economic interpretation of the Constitution because they question whether the Constitution is strictly an economic document designed solely to promote specific economic interests. Brown and B. Contends it is nearly impossible to identify the supporters or opponents of the Constitution with specific economic interests. Jensen, Merrill. Rossiter, Clinton. The economic model indicates that a founder weighed the benefits the satisfaction and the costs the sacrifice to himself of his actions, making those choices that were in his self-interest, broadly defined to include any pecuniary and non-pecuniary benefits and costs of his choices. August 14, This reexamination, which employs formal economics and modern statistical techniques, involves the application of an economic model of voting behavior during the drafting and ratification processes and the collection and processing of large amounts of data on the economic and financial interests and other characteristics of the men who drafted and ratified the Constitution. The modern evidence suggests that constitutions are the products of the interests of those who design and adopt them.
Concerns issues of interest mainly to political scientists, voting alignments and coalition formation. This would have given the national Congress the power to limit the economic viability of slavery, if it so chose. The fiscal problems under the Articles were twofold.
In the ratification, it became manifest that the line of cleavage for and against the Constitution was between substantial personalty interests on the one hand and the small farming and debtor interests on the other.
based on 102 review